NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hawat (No 5) [2019] NSWSC 1727 Hearing dates: 29 November 2019 Date of orders: 03 December 2019 Decision date: 09 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: The material contained in LDs 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 is inadmissible, except for the audible passages referred to at [50]-[54]. Catchwords: CRIME – evidence – murder – joint criminal enterprise – accessory before the fact – listening device material – relevance – probative value – inaudible Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 55, 56, 76, 78, 79 Cases Cited: Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions (1987) 164 CLR 180; [1987] HCA 58 Colby v The Queen [1999] NSWCCA 261 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 277 ALR 611; [2011] HCA 21 Honeysett v R (2014) 253 CLR 122; HCA 29 Kheir v R [2014] VSCA 200 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352; HCA 36 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; 2001 NSWCA 305 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; HCA 37 R v Georgiou [2005] NSWCCA 237 Regina v Leung and Wong (1998) 47 NSWLR 405; NSWCCA 287 Williams v The Queen [1982] Tas R 266 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Osama Hawat (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr T McCarthy (Crown) Mr J Kelly SC (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Dib & Associates Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2017/194590
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate