NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Modog Pty Ltd v ZS Constructions (Queenscliff) Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1743 Hearing dates: 27 November 2019 Date of orders: 06 December 2019 Decision date: 06 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Henry J Decision: (1) The proceedings be dismissed. (2) The sum of $57,488.66 paid into Court on 1 November 2019 be paid to the first defendant. (3) The plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – payment claims under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) – adjudication determination – whether email and attached schedule sent by project manager a payment claim under s 13(1) – whether defendant was person who sent documents it asserts was a payment claim – whether multiple payment claims served in respect of one reference date Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), ss 13, 22, 24 Cases Cited: Alan Conolly and Co v Commercial Indemnity [2005] NSWSC 339 All Seasons Air Pty Ltd v Regal Consulting Services Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 289 Ardnas (No 1) Pty Ltd v J Group (Australia) Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 805 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd (2006) 67 NSWLR 9; [2006] NSWCA 238 Icon Co NSW Pty Ltd v Australia Avenue Developments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 339 Impero Pacific Group Pty Ltd v Bonheur Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 286 Kitchen Xchange v Formacon Building Services [2014] NSWSC 1602 Quickway Constructions Pty Ltd v Electrical Energy Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 337 Rail Corporations of NSW v Nebax Constructions [2012] NSWSC 6 Sought After Investments Pty Ltd v Unicus Homes Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 600 Southern Han Breakfast Point Pty Limited (in liquidation) v Lewence Construction Pty Ltd & Ors (2016) 260 CLR 340; [2016] HCA 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Modog Pty Limited ZS Constructions (Queenscliff) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Gregory Purcell (Second Defendant) Adjudicate Today Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Phillips (Plaintiff) Mr BD Kaplan (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate