NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Grain Technology Australia Ltd v Rosewood Research Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1744 Hearing dates: 25 October 2019 Date of orders: 07 November 2019 Decision date: 07 November 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Parker J Decision: See [37]. Catchwords: EQUITY — Receivers and managers appointed by court over certain property — Application for approval of Deed of Settlement and Release providing certain aspects condition upon "approval from the Court" – where Receiver did not seek judicial advice or approval of Court in terms – principles governing directions to receivers, judicial advice and administration proceedings – proceedings resolved by agreement for direction that further deed be entered excluding requirement for approval by the Court.
COSTS – payment of plaintiff's costs sought out of companies' assets – where cross-claim would not otherwise have been brought by company against directors – where claim largely stood on work underpinning primary claim in proceedings – costs accepted as appropriate by parties. Legislation Cited: Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), s 63 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) ("UCPR"), Part 54, r 54.3 Cases Cited: Davis v Gray 83 US 203 (1872) Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Mens Health Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Young J, 30 April 1998, unrep) Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (2008) 237 CLR 66; [2008] HCA 42 Mariconte v Batiste (2000) 48 NSWLR 724; [2000] NSWSC 288 Marley v Mutual Security Merchant Bank & Trust Co Ltd [1991] 3 All ER 198 Re IOOF Australia Trustees Ltd (1999) 205 LSJS 98; [1999] SASC 461 Re Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [2010] NSWSC 1403 Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2) [1975] QB 373; [1975] 1 ALL ER 849; [1975] 2 WLR 389 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Grain Technology Australia Ltd (First Plaintiff) Raymond Bruce Schwartz (Second Plaintiff) Manidra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Bakers Delight Holdings Limited (Fourth Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate