NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Paul v Forestry Corporation of NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 250 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 December 2019 Decision date: 09 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C A Mulvey, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 a hearing is dispensed with. (2) The decision of the respondent made 6 July 2018 is affirmed. (3) The decision of the respondent made 12 December 2018 is varied such that the respondent is to refuse to deal with item 1 pursuant to s. 60(1) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW). Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – government information – whether dealing with the application would involve an unreasonable and substantial diversion of resources – whether multiple applications are related Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997(NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) State Records Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cianfrano v Premier's Department [2006] NSWADT 137 Colefax v Department of Education and Communities (No 1) [2013] NSWADT 42 Colefax v Department of Education and Communities (No 2) [2013] NSWADT 130 Commissioner of Police (NSW) v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Loussikian v University of Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 140 Paul v Forestry Corporation of NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 68 (26 April 2019) Singh v Legal Aid Commission (No.2) [2015] NSWCATAD 5 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2016] NSWCATAD 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ian Paul (Applicant) Forestry Commission of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00363722 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate