NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Morris v Hutchison (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 189 Hearing dates: 3 December 2019 Date of orders: 09 December 2019 Decision date: 09 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 8 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [67] Catchwords: COSTS - application by Applicant to vary and expand upon costs order proposed in primary judgment - application for indemnity costs based on non‑acceptance of offer of compromise - offer incapable of lawful implementation if accepted - not a valid offer - no basis to award indemnity costs - application for costs order against Second Respondent - no proper basis to make costs order against Second Respondent - submissions that costs for substituted performance application to implement Order (1) of primary judgment should not be on the indemnity basis and that charged elements were excessive - submissions rejected - costs of substituted performance application for implement Order (1) of primary judgment appropriate to be ordered on the indemnity basis - appropriate to make a gross sum costs order for these costs - gross sum costs order made - partial success for both parties in costs proceedings - appropriate that there be no order for costs of costs proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Mining Act 1992, s 175 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 40.8 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Morris v Hutchison [2019] NSWLEC 164 Project Blue Sky v ABA [1998] 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Ross v Lane Cove Council [2014] NSWCA 50 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd and others (1979) 28 ALR 201 Texts Cited: NSW Government Gazette of Friday 12 June 2015. The extract, being pages 1658 to 1661 Category: Costs Parties: Shane Leslie Morris (Applicant) Owen Hutchison (First Respondent) Justin Hawkins (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms F Ashworth, barrister (Applicant) Mr D Stretton, barrister (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate