NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Schneider v R [2019] NSWCCA 292 Hearing dates: 27 November 2019 Decision date: 16 December 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: Extension of time to give notice of application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Application for extension of time – Notice of application for leave to appeal against sentence – Obtaining a financial advantage by deception – Quantum over $1.4 million – Self-represented applicant – Newborn grandchild with difficult medical conditions – Recently discovered psychological conditions of son – Whether sentence manifestly excessive – Grounds doomed to failure – Necessary extension refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jodi Louise Schneider (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) D Patch (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/248136 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 7 September 2018 Before: Ellis SC DCJ File Number(s): 2017/248136
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate