NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: David v Kazal [2019] NSWSC 1763 Hearing dates: 6 December 2019 Decision date: 10 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: See paragraph [42] Catchwords: PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – foreign judgments and orders – stay application pending determination of appeal in US – stay refused
COSTS – security for costs – plaintiff ordinarily resident in California – security ordered Legislation Cited: Cal. Civ. Code, §§ 1708.7, 3294 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth) Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.21 Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30; [1988] HCA 25 Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider (2005) 91 SASR 544; [2005] SASC 194 Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider (2007) 211 FLR 113; [2007] SASC 250 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation [2012] NSWSC 1279 Surgibit IP Holdings Pty Limited v Ellis (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1379 XPlore Technologies Corporation of America v Tough Corp Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1267 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Roderic David (Plaintiff) Tony Kazal (First Defendant) Adam Kazal (Second Defendant) Charif Kazal (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Hogan-Doran/B Mawassi (Plaintiff) J McComish (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate