NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zamattia v Zamattia [2019] NSWSC 1769 Hearing dates: 10 December 2019 Decision date: 10 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Leeming JA Decision: The proceedings be stayed until such time as Mr Luitingh ceases to act for any of the parties. Catchwords: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – stay of proceedings – two brothers were directors of a company and also trustees of a trust – company commenced proceedings against Sydney Water – security for costs ordered and provided – proceedings ultimately dismissed –separate proceedings brought by one brother against other for breach of trust – cross-summons seeking removal of plaintiff brother as trustee – counsel retained by company in Sydney Water proceedings took instructions from both directors in relation to security for costs and financial circumstances of company and the brothers – security for costs ultimately satisfied by funds lent by brothers' parents – distribution to repay parents challenged in pending proceedings – circumstances in which company provided other amounts to trustees in issue in pending proceedings – counsel formerly retained by company appeared for plaintiff brother – evidence unclear as to extent of his involvement in the litigation – whether counsel had received confidential information from defendant brother – whether proceedings should be stayed in exercise of inherent jurisdiction – whether any or all of counsel and solicitors for plaintiff could continue to act – evidence did not establish confidential information imparted to counsel – proceedings stayed pending counsel ceasing to act – no basis presently established for preventing other counsel and solicitors from acting for plaintiff Cases Cited: Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561; [2005] NSWSC 1181 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A Firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 Spincode Pty Ltd v Look Software Pty Ltd (2001) 4 VR 501; [2001] VSCA 248 Zamtech Truck Service Pty Ltd v Sydney Water Corporation [2017] NSWSC 768 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Anthony Zamattia as trustee for the Zamattia Family Trust (Plaintiff, one of the cross-defendants) David Zamattia (First defendant/First cross-claimant) Samuel Zamattia (Second defendant/Second cross-claimant) Bruno Zamattia (Third defendant/Third cross-claimant) Carolina Zamattia (Fourth cross-claimant) Anita Zamattia (Cross-defendant) Anthony John Ciancio (Cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate