NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 777 Trading Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2019] NSWLEC 1619 Hearing dates: 16-17 October 2019; 25 November 2019; Conditions filed on 10 December 2019 Date of orders: 13 December 2019 Decision date: 13 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Application LDA2018/0340 for demolition of existing structures, consolidation of 3 lots, and subdivision of the consolidated lots into 2 new lots is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure "A". (3) The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits B, G, H and 1. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – subdivision involving demolition of proposed heritage item – whether dwelling should be demolished – dispute of heritage significance – Planning Proposal for inclusion of site as a heritage item in LEP – whether Planning Proposal is imminent and certain – economic cost of restoring dwelling and impost to owner as consideration of heritage significance and whether warranting demolition of dwelling – value of landscape component (garden) in contributing to site's heritage value – remnant trees forming part of a Critically Endangered Ecological Community – whether proposed lot configuration acceptable in streetscape – disputed condition of any consent – objections to development Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Heritage Act 1977 Ryde Local Environmental Plan 2014 Cases Cited: Helou v Strathfield Municipal Council (2006) 144 LGERA 322; [2006] NSWLEC 66 Norm Fletcher & Associates Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2013] NSWLEC 1118 Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195; [2003] NSWCA 289 Texts Cited: Assessing Heritage Significance (NSW Heritage Office) 2001 Burra Charter (ICOMOS) 2013 Ryde Development Control Plan 2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 777 Trading Pty Ltd (Applicant) City of Ryde Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Lazarus SC (Applicant) Dr S Berveling (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate