NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Limited [2019] NSWLEC 193 Hearing dates: 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 June; 2, 3, 4 and 5 July;8 August 2019 Date of orders: 13 December 2019 Decision date: 13 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [185] Catchwords: SENTENCE - environmental offence - breach of condition of Environment Protection Licence - Defendant operated a waste facility at a significantly greater annual volume than permitted - plea of guilty - Prosecutor asserts factors of aggravation - causing of substantial environmental harm not established - offence committed for financial gain conceded by Defendant - causing harm to human health not established - traffic impacts of truck-queuing and any consequences of trucks being untarped prior to entry to the site not demonstrated to constitute a factor of aggravation - offending conduct assessed as being at the top of the low range for such conduct - full 25% discount for guilty plea appropriate - penalty to be paid to the Environmental Trust - publication order required - appropriate penalty after discount for guilty plea is $90,000 - Defendant to pay Prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed (but subject to opportunity to parties to seek some alternative costs order) Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 257B, 257E, 257G Environmental Trust Act 1998 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, ss 64,121,124, 126-7, 142A, 241, 249, 250 Protection of the Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009, cl 109 Cases Cited: Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Limited (2006) 145 LGERA 234; [2006] NSWLEC 34 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Bombala Investments Pty Ltd (2013) 199 LGERA 236; [2013] NSWLEC 185 Environment Protection Authority v Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd; Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 82 Environment Protection Authority v Custom Chemicals Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 146 Environment Protection Authority v Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 64 Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Ltd [2019] NSWLEC 91 Environment Protection Authority v Mortdale Recycling Pty Ltd [2019] NSWLEC 106 Environment Protection Authority v Timber Industries Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 25 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation (2006) 148 LGERA 299; [2006] NSWLEC 419 Environment Protection Authority v Wyanga Holdings Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Cauchi [2015] NSWLEC 78 Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1; [1942] AC 206 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Plath v Rawson (2009) 170 LGERA 253; [2009] NSWLEC 178 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Thompson; R v Houlton 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Energy Limited; Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Upstream Infrastructure investments Pty Limited [2017] NSWLEC 2 Veen v The Queen (1979) 143 CLR 458; [1979] HCA 7 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Minto Recycling Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P English, barrister (Prosecutor) Mr P Larkin SC/Ms S Ross, barrister (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate