NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sultani v R [2019] NSWDC 747 Hearing dates: 27 November, 10 December 2019 Date of orders: 11 December 2019 Decision date: 11 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 102 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – intimidating officer in execution of duty – nature of District Court's powers in rehearing – whether necessary to identify error by the Local Court. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 60A(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 18 Cases Cited: AG v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 218 Charara v The Queen (2006) 164 A Crim R 39 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Engelbrecht v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 290 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Francisco v R [2019] NSWDC 720 Jamal v DPP [2019] NSWCA 121 Liberato v R (1985) 159 CLR 507 R v Death [2019] NSWDC 682 R v Dookheea (2017) 347 ALR 529; [2017] HCA 36 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Niaas [2005] NSWCCA 120 R v Li (2003) 140 A Crim R 288 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions Mr A Sultani Representation: Mr B Barrack (Appellant) K Austen for the Director of Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2018/71613
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate