NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stockwell v Beaumont;; O'Donnell v Beaumont [2019] NSWSC 1811 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 6 March 2019; 1 May 2019; 4 December 2019 Decision date: 17 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Kunc J Decision: Additional provision ordered for daughter and former wife Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Family provision — Claim by adult child – No issue of principle
SUCCESSION — Family provision — Claim by former spouse for provision from the deceased's estate under Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3 — Whether factors warranting — Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 59(1)(b) Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Camernik v Reholc [2012] NSWSC 1537 Grant v Roberts, Smith v Smith, Roberts v Smith, Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843 Lodin v Lodin [2017] NSWCA 327 Olsen v Olsen & Ors [2019] NSWCA 278 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Steinmetz v Shannon [2019] NSWCA 114; (2019) 368 ALR 161 Verzar v Verzar [2014] NSWCA 45; (2014) 12 ASTLR 523 West v Mann [2013] NSWSC 1852 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2017/264114
Nina Stockwell (Plaintiff)
Samantha Beaumont (Defendant)
2017/332082
Margaret O'Donnell (Plaintiff)
Samantha Beaumont (Defendant) Representation: 2017/264114
Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate