NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hung v R [2019] NSWCCA 303 Hearing dates: 30 October 2019 Date of orders: 18 December 2019 Decision date: 18 December 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Cavanagh J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — leave to appeal against sentence — four counts of supplying not less than the commercial quantity of a prohibited drug contrary to s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) — two offenders — whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take account of applicant's mental illness — parity — whether justifiable sense of grievance when comparing sentence imposed on co-offender — appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 23 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: Bell v R [2019] NSWCCA 271 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Fenech v R [2018] NSWCCA 160 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hing Sum Hung (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Applicant) D Patch (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate