NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hardey v R [2019] NSWCCA 310 Hearing dates: 15 November 2019 Date of orders: 20 December 2019 Decision date: 20 December 2019 Before: Brereton JA at [1] Bellew J at [2] Lonergan [68] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against the sentence imposed in the District Court on 5 December 2018 is granted.
(2) The appeal is allowed.
(3) The sentence imposed in the District Court on 5 December 2018 is quashed.
(4) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years imprisonment commencing on 5 July 2018 and expiring on 4 July 2020, with an additional term of one year imprisonment commencing on 5 July 2020 and expiring on 4 July 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentence – Where sentencing judge imposed sentence partially cumulative on existing sentence – Where special circumstances were found – Structure of sentences such that the applicant would be required to serve 80% of his total sentence before being eligible for parole – Nothing to indicate that the sentencing judge considered the precise impact of the level of accumulation – Error established – Applicant re-sentenced
CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentence – Parity principle – Whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance in light of the sentence imposed on a co-offender – Clear distinguishing subjective features between the two cases – No unjustified disparity in the respective sentences imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: CM v R [2013] NSWCCA 341 GP v R [2017] NSWCCA 200 Green v The Queen; Quinn v the Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Huang v R [2019] NSWCCA 144 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Maglovski v R [2014] NSWCCA 238 McKittrick v R [2014] NSWCCA 128 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin Hardey – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: C Wasley – Applicant C Curtis - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate