NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District v Lazarus [2019] NSWDC 760 Hearing dates: 4, 18 December 2019 Date of orders: 19 December 2019 Decision date: 19 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the Notice of Motion dated 30 May 2019. (2) Order that each party pay its or her own costs of the Notice of Motion. Catchwords: COMPENSATION – whether District Court has jurisdiction to make a compensation order when it is not the court which convicted the offender - Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW) s 97 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Justices Act 1902 (NSW) Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lazarus v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWSC 426 Lazarus v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2019] NSWCA 100 Maxwell v The Queen [1996] HCA 46; (1996) 184 CLR R v Tonks [1963] VR 121 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Higginson [2011] NSWCA 151 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Northern Sydney Local Health District (Applicants) Sandra Lazarus (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Trevena (Solicitor) (Applicants) L Johnson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate