NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R (Cth) v Pirrello, Pirrello & D'Agostino [2019] NSWSC 1838 Hearing dates: 02 December 2019 Date of orders: 02 December 2019 Decision date: 18 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Evidence of a summary chart containing telephone service information is admitted Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – question of the admissibility of summary evidence – s 50 Evidence Act – whether foundational evidence exists for some parts of the summary – whether the foundational evidence supports a valid inference as to user of telephone services used in the course of overt acts Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Joseph D'Agostino (First Accused) Michael Pirrello (Second Accused) Francesco Pirrello (Third Accused) Representation: Counsel:
Proceedings 2017/010927 P McGuire SC/B Anniwell (Crown) J Stratton SC/M Curry for (First Accused)
Proceedings 2016/388954 P McGuire SC/B Anniwell (Crown) D McCallum (Second Accused)
Proceedings 2016/388994 P McGuire SC/B Anniwell (Crown) G Brady SC (Third Accused)
Solicitors:
Proceedings 2017/010927 Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown) Mitchell and Co Lawyers (First Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate