NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v CT (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1864 Hearing dates: 21 November 2019 Date of orders: 22 November 2019 Decision date: 19 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: Order 3 made on 21 June 2019 is varied so that, pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), for the period of the Extended Supervision Order referred to in order 2 made on 21 June 2019, the defendant is directed to comply with the conditions of supervision set out in the schedule to this order [set out in the appendix to these reasons for judgment] rather than the conditions set out in the schedule to the orders made on 21 June 2019. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – Extended supervision orders – Application – Variation – No point of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v CT (Final) [2019] NSWSC 847 State of New South Wales v Golding (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1041 State of New South Wales v Ley Thomas Baker (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 483 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) CT (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Plaintiff) S Fernando (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2019/037393 Publication restriction: Publication of the defendant's name is restricted in accordance with the order of N Adams J made on 22 May 2019.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate