NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Romanos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 272 Hearing dates: 18 December 2019 Date of orders: 24 December 2019 Decision date: 24 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Emeritus Prof GD Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) Decision under review set aside. (2) Not before 10 January 2020, a category AB firearms licence is to be issued to the applicant. Catchwords: LICENSING - firearms – licence revocation – breach of provisions regulating transportation of firearms – whether fit and proper person – good behaviour bond for prescribed offence – public interest - safe storage – exercise of discretion.
WORDS AND PHRASES – "in battery". Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Firearms Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 35, (1990) 170 CLR 321; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 316; Bronze Wing International Pty Ltd v SafeWork New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 42; Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657; Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADT AP 9; Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16; Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50; Director-General, Transport New South Wales v AIC (GD) [2011] NSWADT AP 65; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60; Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (1991) 1 VR 63; Fisher v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 239; Hill v Commissioner of Police [2002] NSWADT 218; Hocking v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2006] NSWADT 227; Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Kalinic v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2006] NSWADT 227; McGrath v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 98; Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10; O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210; Parisi v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 155; Smith v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 184; Sterjovski v Director-General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 10; Wright v Commissioner of Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 98. Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Panagiotis Romanos (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Rodney Kennedy Solicitors Pty Ltd (Applicant) Office of General Counsel (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00213926 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate