NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gu & Wang v Granger & Granger [2020] NSWCATAP 4 Hearing dates: 28 November 2019 Date of orders: 10 January 2020 Decision date: 10 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President P H Molony, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal upheld. (2) The Respondents are to pay to the Appellants the sum of $1,906 within 14 days. (3) Otherwise the order made in RT19/28672 on 11th September 2019 is affirmed Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT-residential tenancy agreement- agreement to reduce rent- appeal on a question of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Interpretation Act 1987 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban[2014]NSWCATAP17 John Prendergast and Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014]NSWCATAP69 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yan Ping Gu (Applicant) James Wang (Applicant)
John Brian Granger (Respondent) Kate Granger (Respondent) Representation: Applicants (Self Represented)
Respondents (Self Represented) File Number(s): AP 19/43512 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer & Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 11 September 2019 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): RT 19/28672
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate