NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fam v Taha [2020] NSWCATAP 3 Hearing dates: 9 December 2019 Date of orders: 10 January 2020 Decision date: 10 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member P Molony, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) Order 2 made by the Tribunal on 26 September 2019 in proceedings GEN 19/26388 is set aside. (3) The proceedings are remitted to the Tribunal for rehearing, with new evidence allowed. (4) Highline Event Centre Pty Ltd is joined as a respondent in the remitted proceedings. Catchwords: APPEAL – Whether respondent correctly named – whether question of law – leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW) 2010 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Fair Trading Act 1987 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Fam ATF D2D Creations Trust (Appellant) Bilal Tana (First Respondent) Danya Darwiche (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Thompson Geer Solicitors (Appellant)
Respondents (Self Represented) File Number(s): AP 19/45292 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 26 September 2019 Before: S Bliim, General Member File Number(s): Gen 19/26388
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate