NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dewan v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2020] NSWCATOD 6 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 January 2020 Decision date: 16 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: P H Molony, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in this matter. (2) The application for administrative review of the decision to revoke Md Ifitkhar Dewan's security industry licence is dismissed under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, as it is lacking in substance and misconceived. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – application for administrative review of decision to revoke a security industry licence issued under the Security Industry Act 1997 – revocation mandatory under s 26A of under the Security Industry Act 1997 – application in proceedings made for summary dismissal under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – administrative review application dismissed as lacking in substance and misconceived Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Security Industry Regulation 2016 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alchin v Rail Corporation NSW [2012] NSWADT 142 Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Ballarto Pastoral Pty Ltd v Department of Primary Industries [2006] VCAT 478 BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129 Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2019] NSWCATAD 176 Feuerstein v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2007] NSWADT 114 The Owners – Strata Plan No. 92334 v Piety Capital Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATCD 22 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Md Ifitkhar Dewan (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Office of the General Counsel (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00260236 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate