NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LiveBetter Services Ltd v Quarmby [2020] NSWSC 7 Hearing dates: 10 January 2020 Decision date: 16 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See [103] Catchwords: EQUITY — equitable remedies — injunctions — Interlocutory injunction — where first defendant a former employee of the plaintiff which is a not-for-profit company offering disability services to customers — where first defendant established the second defendant through which to conduct a business that offers disability services to customers — plaintiff alleges first defendant in breach of confidentiality clause and restraint of trade clause in former employment contract — prima facie case established — balance of convenience — consideration of the impact of an injunction on third parties — not appropriate at the present time to grant injunctive relief
RESTRAINT OF TRADE — general principles governing enforcement of restraint of trade provisions — whether the alleged breach infringes the terms of the restraint — where restraint of trade clause has no temporal or geographical limitation Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 181, 182, 183 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 75 Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Del Casale v Artedomus (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 172; (2007) 165 IR 148 Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 343; [2018] NSWCA 163 National Commercial Bank Jamaica Ltd v Olint Corp Pty Ltd [2009] 1 WLR 1405 Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315 Scruples Imports Pty Ltd v Crabtree & Evelyn Pty Ltd (1983) 1 IPR 315 X v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 200 CLR 177; [1999] HCA 63 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M J Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines & Remedies (5th ed, 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: LiveBetter Services Ltd (plaintiff) Ryan Quarmby (first defendant) New Directions Disability Services Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Easton (plaintiff) N Olson (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate