NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: John Leo Fisher v R (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 2 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 23 January 2020 Decision date: 23 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Applications for costs are dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – COSTS – Applications for costs. Correct statutory provisions entitling Court to make awards. Whether prosecutor unreasonably failed to investigate. Prosecutor need not investigate a defence raised under the proviso to Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 s 4(1). Appellant's success in District Court was only the result of his proving in that Court the defence he did not prove in Local Court. Discretion re awarding costs – real issue not raised on appeal. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 District Court Act 1973 Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 Real Property Act 1900 Justices Act 1902 Cases Cited: Dobbie v Davidson (1991) 23 NSWLR DPP v Deeks (1994) 34 NSWLR 523 Fosse v DPP [1999] NSWSC 367 John Leo Fisher v R [2019] NSWDC 297 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 R v Mosely (1992) 28 NSWLR 735 Category: Costs Parties: John Leo Fisher – Appellant Crown – Respondent Representation: Solicitors: (Appellant) Mr P. O'Brien - O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors (Crown) Ms T. Lumsden - ODPP File Number(s): 2018/00048997 Publication restriction: Nil.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate