NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vito Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWSC 13 Hearing dates: 30 May 2019 Date of orders: 03 February 2020 Decision date: 03 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Occupational Division) – Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) – refusal to reinstate as psychologist – six grounds of appeal – breaches of Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW) – false representations or declarations – convictions of fraud in the United Kingdom – character test for reinstatement – costs Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Sch 5, cl 29 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1)(a) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW), s105, s 105(1) Psychologists Act 2001 (NSW), s 17 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10, s 10(1)(a) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), s 8(7)(b) Cases Cited: B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599; [1992] HCA 68 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245; [1995] HCA 10 Campbell v R [2007] 2 Cr App Rep 28 DS v HM Advocate (2007) SC (PC) 1 Harriman v The Queen [1989] HCA 50 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67 Makin v Attorney-General (1989) 167 CLR 590; [1984] AC 57 O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461; [1995] HCA 7 R v Fouad Bennabou [2012] EWCA Crim 3088 R v Ghosh [1982] 2 All ER 689 R v Hanson, Gilmore & Pickstone [2005] 2 Crim App R 21 R v Highton [2005] 1 WLR 3472 Reg v Boardman [1975] AC 421 Sunol v Collier (2012) 81 NSWLR 619; [2012] NSWCA 14 Vito Zepinic v Château Constructions (Aust) Limited; Nina Zepinic v Château Constructions (Aust) Limited [2018] NSWCA 317 Zaidi v Health Care Complaints Commission (1998) 44 NSWLR 82 Zepinic v Château Constructions (Aust) Ltd; Château Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic [2017] NSWSC 582 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 92 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 166 Zepinic v Psychologists Registration Board of NSW [2010] NSWPST 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Vito Zepinic (Appellant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Appellant) Patricia Lowson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate