EEZ v TAFE NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 35

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: EEZ v TAFE NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 35 Hearing dates: 6 December 2019 Date of orders: 29 January 2020 Decision date: 29 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: (1) Leave for the complaint to proceed is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — equal opportunity — leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited v Banovic [1989] HCA 56; (1989) 168 CLR 165 Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 236 Catholic Education Office v Clarke [2004] FCAFC 197; (2004) 138 FCR 121 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Commissioner of Police v Mohamed [2009] NSWCA 432 DLH v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAD 92 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Frost v TAFE NSW (No 2) [2019] NSWCATAD 129 IW v City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; (1997) 191 CLR 1 Jones & Anor v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland & Anor (1981) 2 NSWLR 104 McEvoy v Acorn Stairlifts Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAD 273 Purvis v New South Wales [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 44 State of New South Wales v Amery [2006] HCA 14; (2006) 230 CLR 174 Walker v State of Victoria [2011] FCA 258 Waters v Public Transport Corporation [1991] HCA 49; (1991) 173 CLR 349 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: EEZ (Applicant) TAFE NSW (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) TAFE NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00375285 Publication restriction: Nil