NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Najmitdinov v Woolworths Group Limited [2020] NSWCATAP 15 Hearing dates: 13 December 2019 Date of orders: 31 January 2020 Decision date: 31 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Armstrong J, President L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: (1) The application for an extension of time to lodge the appeal is refused. (2) Leave to appeal is refused. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – interlocutory order – extension of time required – whether leave should be granted Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWCATAP 79 Armee v Brealey [2017] NSWCATAP 141 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force v Fine [2014] NSWCATAP 24 Edwards v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2019] NSWCATAP 208 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited [2013] HCA 46 Jackson v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Mesiha v Murrell [2017] NSWCATAP 1 Najmitdinov v Woolworths Group Limited [2019] NSWCATAD 51 O'Neill v T and I Engines Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 77 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Azizkhon Najmitdinov (Appellant) Woolworths Group Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Lloyd (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate