NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Quintana (No. 2) [2020] NSWSC 22 Hearing dates: 28 January 2020 Date of orders: 30 January 2020 Decision date: 30 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: The application for trial by judge alone is refused. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for trial by judge alone – issues of self-defence – trial issues involve partial defence of substantial impairment – whether in the interests of justice to make order for judge alone trial – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Belghar (2012) 217 A Crim R 1; [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Gittany [2013] NSWSC 1503 R v Haydar (No. 2) [2017] NSWSC 131 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No. 4) (2015) 249 A Crim R 120; [2015] NSWSC 259 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 Gilbert v R (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 208 CLR 460; [2002] HCA 9 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Rey Quintana (Accused) Representation: Counsel: A Evers (Applicant) D Daleo (Respondent)
Solicitors: Oxford Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00067200 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate