NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Delleci v R [2020] NSWCCA 4 Hearing dates: 25 November 2019 Decision date: 06 February 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Harrison J at [71]; Button J at [72] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – two episodes of drug supply each involving the supply of different kinds of drugs – whether sentence manifestly excessive – whether parity principle should apply – limitations on use of statistics – sentences not excessive – no application of the parity principle – offending and personal characteristics different for each offender – no justifiable sense of grievance. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 193C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – ss 10, 10A, 21A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – ss 25(1), 25(2) Cases Cited: BB v R [2017] NSWCCA 189 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 JM v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Kresovic v R [2018] NSWCCA 37 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Nguyen v R [2019] NSWCCA 87 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 Tuite v R [2018] NSWCCA 175 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Neil Delleci – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: S Kluss – Applicant C Curtis – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate