NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Padua [2019] NSWDC 787 Hearing dates: 19 July 2019 Date of orders: 23 July 2019 Decision date: 23 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Term of imprisonment of 6 years with a non-parole period of 3 years 6 months Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Armed robbery — Offensive weapon SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Principles to be applied SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Ratio of the non-parole period and balance of term SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — General principles SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Bugmy v R (2013) HCA 37 Markarian v R (2005) HCA 25 Muldrock v R (2011) HCA 39 Munda v State of Western Australia [2013] HAC 38 Tepania v R (2018) NSWCCA 247 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Lenard Padua (Offender) Representation: Ms Fargher (Crown) Ms Marsden
Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Legal Aid (NSW) (Offender) File Number(s): 2018/00315882
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate