NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Misa; R v Ramos-Malo; R v Vaafusuaga [2019] NSWDC 788 Hearing dates: 04 October 2019 Date of orders: 04 December 2019 Decision date: 04 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Ramos-Malo – aggregate sentence of 10 years with a non-parole period of 6 years Misa – aggregate sentence of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years Vaafusuaga – term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Assault occasioning actual bodily harm CRIME — Violent offences — Wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Principles to be applied SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Co-offenders SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Co-offenders — Joint criminal enterprise SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Co-offenders — Joint sentence proceedings SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — De Simoni/double counting SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Form 1 offences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — General principles SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Maximum penalty SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences — Aggregate sentences SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Objective seriousness SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Parole period SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Age of offender SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Road Transport Act 2013 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Munda v State of Western Australia [2013] HAC 38 R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Dahcell Marco Charlton Ramos-Malo (Offender) Pio Misa (Offender) Jimmy Vaafusuaga (Offender) Representation: Henry Hudson (Crown) Brian Royce (counsel) (Offender – Misa) David Pullinger (counsel) (Offender – Ramos-Malo) Greg Smith SC (counsel) (Offender – Vaafusuaga
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate