NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Plummer [2020] NSWCATOD 16 Hearing dates: 14 February 2020 and on the papers Date of orders: 20 February 2020 Decision date: 20 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Boland AM ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: The Tribunal consents to the Application for Disciplinary Findings and Orders filed on 20 December 2019 being withdrawn. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – registered health practitioner – registered pharmacist – whether it is in the public interest for complaint about the practitioner to be withdrawn Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Singh [2016] NSWCATOD 85 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sarfraz [2015] NSWCATOD 75 Health Care Complaints Commission v Torinello [2015] NSWCATOD 90 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant)
Alan Plummer (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent File Number(s): 2019/00401060 Publication restriction: An order is made under s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act prohibiting publication of the names of the Patients set out in the schedule to the complaint.
REASONS FOR DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate