NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gershuny v R; Ruiz v R [2020] NSWCCA 14 Hearing dates: 7 February 2020 Date of orders: 14 February 2020 Decision date: 14 February 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Adamson J at [2]; Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: In the matter of Richard Gershuny v R:
(1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal upheld. (3) The sentence imposed by M L Williams SC DCJ on 27 January 2017 be set aside. (4) The applicant is sentenced to a head sentence of 9 years commencing on 6 November 2015 and expiring on 5 November 2024, with a non‑parole period of 4 years 6 months, expiring on 5 May 2020.
In the matter of Cesar Ruiz v R:
(1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal upheld. (3) The sentence imposed by M L Williams SC DCJ on 9 December 2016 be set aside. (4) The applicant is sentenced to a head sentence of 9 years commencing on 6 November 2015 and expiring on 5 November 2024, with a non‑parole period of 4 years 6 months, expiring on 5 May 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against sentence – application for leave to appeal – attempt to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug, contrary to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 11.1(1) and 307.1(1) – utilitarian value of plea of guilty for Commonwealth offence – Xiao error established – whether applicant to be resentenced – consideration of parity principle to sentence imposed by differently constituted Court of Criminal Appeal – applicant resentenced afresh – leave granted – appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Diaz v R [2019] NSWCCA 216 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Greentree v R [2018] NSWCCA 227 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 409 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Gershuny (Applicant in 2015/327239) Cesar Ruiz (Applicant in 2015/327241) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Avenell (Applicants) K Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate