NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Simmons v R [2020] NSWCCA 16 Hearing dates: 5 February 2020 Decision date: 14 February 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Adamson J at [2]; Beech-Jones J at [34] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING – Appeal against sentence – objective seriousness – aggravating factors – whether sentencing judge failed to distinguish between objective seriousness and aggravating factors – alleged manifest excess
SENTENCING – Appeal against sentence – severity – sentence manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61, 97, 112, 114, 117, 195, 546C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 9, 32, 33 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10 Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW), s 6A Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 1 of 2002) (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fletcher Simmons (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Wasley (Applicant) M Kumar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate