NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paul Herbert Kennedy v Mark Alexander-Erber [2020] NSWDC 15 Hearing dates: 6 June 2019, 7 June 2019, 5 July 2019, 2 August 2019, 21 November 2019 Date of orders: 14 February 2020 Decision date: 14 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Montgomery DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $130,000.00; (2) Interest pursuant to s 100 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) on the amount of (a) $60,000.00 for the period commencing 26 June 2015 and ending 5 June 2016; (b) separately on the amount of $80,000.00 for the period commencing 31 August 2015 and ending 5 June 2016; and (c) on the sum of $130,000.00 thereafter; (3) The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the normal basis; and (4) I return the exhibits Catchwords: Contract; whether orally made or written – whether copies of contracts in evidence true – whether signatures on copy contracts fabricated Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 47, 48, 55(1), 56(1), 78, and 140 (1) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 100 UCPR r 42.5 Cases Cited: Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 3 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; [1992] HCA 66 Re Day (2017) 340 ALR 368; [2017] HCA 2 Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd v Calleja [2018] NSWCA 26 Effem v Lake Cumbeline Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 15; (1999) 161 ALR 599 at 603 Bale v Mills (2011) 282 ALR 336; [2011] NSWCA 226 at [63]-[67] Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Herbert Kennedy (plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate