NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cowap v Cowap [2020] NSWCA 19 Hearing dates: 4 December 2019 Date of orders: 19 February 2020 Decision date: 19 February 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; White JA at [61] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – competing interests of disabled adult son and elderly widow – whether provision ordered in favour of son manifestly excessive – whether "adequate weight" given to widow's claim to continue to reside in former matrimonial home – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 Majid v R [2010] NSWCCA 121 Steinmetz v Shannon [2019] NSWCA 114 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barbara Constance Cowap (Appellant) Nicholas John Cowap (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Meek SC / T Catanzariti (Appellant) A Crossland / J Treherne (Respondent)
Solicitors: Campbell & Co Lawyers (Appellant) Maksisi Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/288936 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Division – Family Provision List Citation: [2019] NSWSC 1104 Date of Decision: 22 August 2019 Before: Kunc J File Number(s): 2017/387693
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate