NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cooke v Medical Council of NSW [2020] NSWCATOD 15 Hearing dates: 9 December 2019 Date of orders: 21 February 2020 Decision date: 21 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Le Poer Trench ADCJ, Principal Member Decision: The application for costs of these proceedings is dismissed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – health and professionals – medical practitioners – costs application following an appeal dismissed by consent. Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No 86a ("the National Law") Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 (Philipiah); Qasim V Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 (Qasim); James v Surf Road Nominees Pty. Ltd (No. 2) [2005] NSWCA 296. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Exhibit parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622. Texts Cited: None cited Category: Costs Parties: Jason Brenden Cooke (Applicant) Medical Council of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Fraser (Applicant)
Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth (Applicant) Medical Council of NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00273248 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) an order is made prohibiting publication of the name of the patients set out in the schedule to the complaint.
REASONS FOR DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate