NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Megerditchian v Khatchadourian (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 112 Hearing dates: 11 and 20 February 2020 Date of orders: 20 February 2020 Decision date: 20 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [52] Catchwords: COSTS – incidence of costs – family provision claim – amount of provision within District Court's jurisdictional limit – whether plaintiff to be deprived of costs under UCPR r 42.34 COSTS – incidence of costs – family provision claim – informal offer – whether plaintiff's rejection of offer reasonable Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 3(1) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 134(1), 134(1)(c), 134(2) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), s 14 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3, s 72(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Pt 42 Div 3, rr 42.34, 42.34(1), 23.24(2) Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93 Carusi-Lees v Carusi [2017] NSWSC 590 Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322 Liprini v Liprini [2008] NSWSC 423 Category: Costs Parties: Vanoush Megerditchian (Plaintiff) Hampartzoum Khatchadourian (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V R Gray (Plaintiff) P Muscat (Defendant)
Solicitors: Corporate & Civil Legal (Plaintiff) Shad Partners (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/318533 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate