NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Liristis v Corrective Services NSW (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 147 Hearing dates: 14 May 2019 Date of orders: 28 February 2020 Decision date: 28 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The proceeding be summarily dismissed;
(2) The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of and incidental to the proceedings. Catchwords: CONTEMPT – conduct said to be calculated to obstruct or interfere with the due administration of justice – application by defendants to dismiss summarily – principles discussed – allegation and proceedings "hopeless" – proceedings dismissed
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE – summary dismissal – contempt – principles discussed – exception to interfere in proceedings for contempt by summary dismissal – exception warranted – proceedings "hopeless" and commenced irregularly Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 55 Cases Cited: Ali v Collection Point Pty Ltd (2010) 274 ALR 618; [2010] FCA 1066 ASIC v Sigalla [2010] NSWSC 606 Clarkson v Mandarin Club Limited (1998) 90 FCR 354; [1998] FCA 1685 Commissioner of Corrective Services v Liristis (2018) 98 NSWLR 113; [2018] NSWCA 143 Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Grocon Constructors (Victoria) Pty Ltd & Ors; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors (2014) 47 VR 527; [2014] VSCA 261 Coward v Stapleton (1953) 90 CLR 573; [1953] HCA 48 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; [1949] HCA 1 Farahbakht v Midas Australia Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1322 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Henri Walter Aram v The Owners Strata Plan No 20175 [2012] NSWSC 1273 King v Healthcare Complaints Commission [2011] NSWCA 353 Kostov v YPOL Pty Ltd (2018) 19 NSWLR 1002; [2018] NSWCA 306 Mahaffy v Mahaffy [2013] NSWSC 245 Markisic (Oliver) v The Commonwealth [2006] NSWCA 150 Matthews v ASIC [2009] NSWCA 155 Midland Metals Overseas v Australian Cablemakers Association (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1128 O'Connor v Hough [2016] 2 Qd R 543; [2016] QSC 4 Patsalis v State of New South Wales (2012) 81 NSWLR 742; [2012] NSWCA 307 R v Metal Trades Employers' Association; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union (1951) 82 CLR 208; [1951] HCA 3 Raymond v Honey [1983] 1 AC 1 Skouvakis v Skouvakis [1976] 2 NSWLR 29 Taylor v Ribby Hall Leisure Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 400 U & I Global (Australia) Pty Ltd v Tasman-Warajay Pty Ltd (1995) 60 FCR 26; [1995] FCA 794 Ulman v Live Group Pty Ltd (2018) 367 ALR 95; [2018] NSWCA 338 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525; [1995] HCA 3 Zomojo Pty Ltd v Hurd (No 5) [2014] FCA 537 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Tony Liristis (Plaintiff/Respondent) Corrective Services NSW (First Defendant/Applicant) State of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: No appearance (Plaintiff) P Herzfeld (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate