NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wallis v Rudek [2020] NSWSC 162 Hearing dates: 17, 18, 20 February 2020 Date of orders: 26 February 2020 Decision date: 26 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [140] Catchwords: EQUITY – equitable interest in property – family arrangement – transferee pays off mortgage on property – equity in property exceeds amount owing – transferor permitted to remain in property – licence agreement not signed – relationship breakdown – Baumgartner v Baumgartner equity recognised – equitable compensation granted
EQUITY – general principles and maxims – they who seek equity must do equity – false claim of Commonwealth rental assistance – repayment of monies, interest and penalties as a condition of relief Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 23C, 54A Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yuri Wallis (First Plaintiff) Olga Wallis (Second Plaintiff) Suzanne Rudek (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Oliak/DE Thomas (First and Second Plaintiffs) J Bennett (Defendant)
Solicitors: P Dobrich & Co (First and Second Plaintiffs) Optic Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/191080 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate