NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Love [2020] NSWSC 165 Hearing dates: 26 February 2020 Date of orders: 02 March 2020 Decision date: 02 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: 1. Summons dismissed 2. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – Application pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – Final hearing – Whether defendant is a high risk violent offender – continuing detention order – extended supervision order – no order made – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Chaplin [2019] NSWSC 471 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Love (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 1660 State of New South Wales v Simcock (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1805 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Nathan Love (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: H El-Hage (Plaintiff) C Goodhand (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2019/331852 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate