NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Newman v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2020] NSWLEC 1099 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference held on 28 February 2020 Date of orders: 05 March 2020 Decision date: 05 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application for development consent pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed amount of $10,000 within 28 days of the date of the orders. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application No. 588/2016 for the demolition of the existing building and construction of a new five storey mixed-use development above basement parking at 1608-1612 Canterbury Road, Punchbowl, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure 'A'. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – construction of a five storey mixed-use development over basement parking – exceedance of the height of buildings development standard – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties. Legislation Cited: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90 Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118 RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Henry Newman (First Applicant) Judith Newman (Second Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Gadiel (Solicitor) (Applicants) P Hudson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate