NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bow v Carapella [2020] NSWSC 171 Hearing dates: 28 February 2020 Date of orders: 28 February 2020 Decision date: 28 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The proceedings be dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff pay the defendant's cost of the proceedings. Catchwords: Motor accidents – pleading in negligence and "blameless accident" provisions – made 9 years after accident – no full and satisfactory explanation – whether required for blameless accident– whether claim must be lodged – whether failure of insurer to invoke s 73(4) affects operation of s 109 Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Cases Cited: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Comber (1986) 10 FCR 88 Muller v Dalgety & Co Limited (1909) 9 CLR 693; [1909] HCA 67 Naw Eh Soe v Alberto Carapella; Saw Rain Bow v Alberto Carapella; Naw Su Su Bow v Alberto Carapella; Moe Moe Aye v Alberto Carapella [2014] NSWSC 1644 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 35; [1980] HCA 41 Woodlock v Commissioner of Land Tax (1974) 2 NSWLR 411 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Naw Su Su Bow (Plaintiff/Respondent) Alberto Carapella (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: T McKenzie (Plaintiff/Respondent) D Hanna (Defendant/Applicant)
Solicitors: Taylor & Scott Lawyers (Plaintiff/Respondent) Moray & Agnew (Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): 2019/246665
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate