NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gu v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWCATAD 75 Hearing dates: 26 February 2019. 27 March 2019 Date of orders: 05 March 2020 Decision date: 05 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Chief Commissioner, made on 23 April 2018, is varied by a reduction of 20% being the concealment component of the penalty. (2) In all other respects the decision of the Chief Commissioner is confirmed. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES – administrative review of a decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue to assess the applicants as liable to pay duty under Part 4 of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW) – whether the exemption under s 163B of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW) applied – whether the exercise of the discretion in s 163H of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW) should be exercised
TAXES AND DUTIES – whether appropriate to remit penalty and interest – increased penalty for concealment Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Duties Act 1997 (NSW) State Revenue Legislation Amendment Act 2017 (NSW) State Revenue Legislation Amendment Act 2014 Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Incise Technologies Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADTAP 19 Milstern Nominees Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWSC 68 Winston-Smith v Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] NSWSC 773 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qing Rong Gu (First Applicant) Ying Zhang (Second Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J King (Second Applicant) K Lord (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate