Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gus Kak v Allison Sarah Kak (née Boman) [No 2] [2020] NSWSC 187 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 06 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant is to pay the costs of the First Defendant/Cross-Claimant of the proceedings Catchwords: COSTS – First Defendant/Cross-Claimant succeeds – whether costs should follow the event – HELD – costs should follow the event Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gus Kak v Allison Sarah Kak (née Boman) [2020] NSWSC 140 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Gus Kak - Plaintiff Cross-Defendant Allison Sarah Kak (née Boman) - First Defendant Cross-Claimant Deputy State Coroner Truscott - Second Defendant Representation: Counsel: J.D. Cook - Plaintiff Cross-Defendant A.F. Stevens - First Defendant Cross-Claimant Second Defendant submitting appearance Solicitors: Kammoun Sukari Lawyers - Plaintiff Cross-Defendant Gibson Howlin Lawyers - First Defendant Cross-Claimant Crown Solicitor for NSW - Second Defendant File Number(s): 2020/55921 Judgment 1. HIS HONOUR: On 26 February 2020, I gave judgment in the principal dispute: Gus Kak v Allison Sarah Kak (née Boman) [2020] NSWSC 140. Definitions used there are used here. 2. Allison succeeded. She seeks costs. 3. Gus seeks an order that each party pay their own. 4. Costs are in the discretion of the Court. The starting point, however, is that costs follow the event unless it appears to the Court that some other order should be made: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.1. 5. Gus submits that the usual position should not pertain because: * Gus started the proceedings before he knew about the will; * Omar did not, in his will, provide instructions for his burial; * Gus made open concessions about the evidence and proposed compromises during the course of the matter; and * other decisions in this field of discourse have ordered that the parties should pay their own costs. 1. I see no reason to depart from the rule that costs follow the event. 2. Gus may not have known about the will when he started the proceedings but he carried on with them when he did know about it. 3. The executor has the right to determine burial matters absent compelling, countervailing reasons. Gus' concessions and offers of compromise, if anything, strengthened Allison's case. Other cases are of little assistance because costs are determined on the circumstances of the case in hand. 4. The Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant is to pay the costs of the First Defendant/Cross-Claimant of the proceedings. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 March 2020