Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 226

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 226 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 13 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See paras 72 and 74. Proceedings are to be stood over to 10 AM on 9 April 2020. Note paras 23 to 25, 63 and 64 with regards to necessary elements of future submissions made by the parties. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 167 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Almona Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd (first defendant) Secured Asset Portfolio III Limited (second defendant) PT Limited (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Williams SC / E Bishop (plaintiff) K Andronos SC / S Keizer (first defendant) EAJ Hyde / T Epstein (second defendant) J Taylor (third defendant)

Solicitors: Bartier Perry (plaintiff) Norton Rose Fulbright (first defendant) King & Wood Mallesons (second defendant) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (third defendant) File Number(s): 2018/317496

Judgment 1. On 28 February 2020, a hearing took place concerning the orders that should now be made following the delivery of the principal judgment in these proceedings. 2. On 2 March 2020, I circulated to the parties a judgment in which, at [80], I set out the orders that I provisionally intended to make at this stage: Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 167. I invited the parties to deliver additional brief submissions in writing concerning the terms of the orders, because the time available for the hearing had not been adequate to enable all parties to develop their submissions. 3. All parties have now provided to the Court the additional submissions they were invited to make. These reasons respond to those submissions. 4. It will be convenient to deal with the proposed orders in the order in which they are set out in [80] of the previous judgment.