NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Haxglow Pty Ltd v Mirvac Retail Sub SPV Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 233 Hearing dates: 4 March 2020 Date of orders: 17 March 2020 Decision date: 17 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Valuer's determination of current market rent held to be final and binding. Plaintiff entitled to recover over payment of rent. Defendants' cross-claim is dismissed. Catchwords: VALUATION – expert determination – valuer appointed pursuant to lease to determine current market rent – whether determination carried out in accordance with the terms of the lease – adequacy of reasons given by valuer – whether valuer required to comply with code of professional conduct – whether valuer failed to comply with code – whether valuer failed to disregard goodwill of lessee's business – whether valuer failed to have regard to incentives given to lessees of comparable premises – not shown that determination was not carried out in accordance with the provisions of the lease – determination held to be final and binding on the parties
LAND LAW – leases – rent – provision for review of rent – valuer appointed as expert to determine current market rent – whether determination carried out in accordance with the terms of the lease – adequacy of reasons given by valuer – whether valuer required to comply with code of professional conduct – whether valuer failed to comply with code – whether valuer failed to disregard goodwill of lessee's business – whether valuer failed to have regard to incentives given to lessees of comparable premises – not shown that determination was not carried out in accordance with the provisions of the lease – determination held to be final and binding on the parties Cases Cited: AGL Victoria Pty Ltd v SPI Networks (Gas) Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 173 Australian Vintage Ltd v Belvino Investments No 2 Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 367; [2015] NSWCA 275 Data Base Corporate Pty Ltd v Strike Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 271 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; 2017 HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Halifax Life Ltd v Equitable Life Assurance Society [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 528 Holt v Cox (1997) 23 ACSR 590 Kavinah Holdings Pty Ltd v Holdsworth Properties Pty Ltd (2001) 10 BPR 18,825; [2001] NSWSC 405 Kanivah Holdings Pty Ltd v Holdsworth Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 11 BPR 20,201; [2002] NSWCA 180 Lainson Holdings Pty Ltd v Duffy Kennedy Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 576 Legal & General Life of Aust Ltd v A Hudson Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 314 Shoalhaven City Council v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd (2011) 244 CLR 305; [2011] HCA 38 Strike Australia Pty Ltd v Data Base Corporate Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 205 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haxglow Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mirvac Retail Sub SPV Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Perron Investments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A P Coleman SC with Mr J S Burnett (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr A Fernon (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate