NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: EGJ v Point to Point Transport Commissioner [2020] NSWCATOD 29 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 25 March 2020 Decision date: 25 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 a hearing is dispensed with. (2) The application for review is dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – ineligible driver - no administratively reviewable decision Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Point to Point Transport (Taxis and Hire Vehicles) Act 2016 Point to Point Transport (Taxis and Hire Vehicles) Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Alameddine v Roads and Maritime Services [2018] NSWCATAD 22 Hossain v Roads and Maritime Services [2018] NSWCATOD 11 Tabbaa v NSW Taxi Council [2020] NSWCATAD 46 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: EGJ (Applicant) Point to Point Transport Commissioner (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self Respresented) Point to Point Transport Commissioner (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00237078 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 disclosure of the name of the applicant is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate