NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Najmitdinov v Woolworths Group Limited [2020] NSWCATAD 88 Hearing dates: 4 March 2020 Date of orders: 23 March 2020 Decision date: 23 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: (1) Leave for the complaint to proceed is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — equal opportunity — whether leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bonella v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2017] NSWCATAD 236 Jones & Anor v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Langley v Niland & Anor (1981) 2 NSWLR 104 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Najmitdinov v Woolworths Group Limited [2019] NSWCATAD 51 Najmitdinov v Woolworths Group Limited [2020] NSWCATAP 15 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 44 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Azzkhon Najmitdinov (Applicant) Woolworths Group Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Lloyd (Respondent)
Solicitors: Ashurst solicitors (Respondent) Applicant (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2019/00294587 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate