NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Koloamatangi v R; Popovic v R [2020] NSWCCA 52 Hearing dates: 24 September 2019 Date of orders: 01 April 2020 Decision date: 01 April 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Bell P at [384]; Price J at [385] Decision: (1) Grant the applicants leave to appeal. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Quash the conviction of the appellants for the murder of Dragan Sekuljica and in lieu thereof enter a verdict of acquittal. (4) Pursuant to s 7 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) (the Act) the following portions of the judgment be suppressed until further order on the grounds set out in s 8(1)(a), (c) and (e) of the Act: [179] second sentence; [184]-[185]; [196]-[205]; [207] third sentence, after "on the way" and before "so I just"; [210] second sentence; [211]-[219]; [220] first and second sentences; [222] first sentence after "made his first induced statement". (5) Order 4 shall apply throughout the Commonwealth. (6) Grant leave to the parties and the Commissioner of Police to make an application within 7 days to vary the suppression order. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against conviction - Miscarriage of justice – Principle of incontrovertibility – Whether evidence challenged acquittal of a non-party – Whether an abuse of process – No application of principle of incontrovertibility.
CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against conviction – Unreasonable verdict – Unreliable witnesses – Facts which required proof beyond reasonable doubt – Verdict of acquittal substituted. Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: AB v CD, EF v CD [2018] HCA 58; (2018) 93 ALJR 59 Abdallah v The Queen [2019] NSWCCA 294 AJS v The Queen (2007) 235 CLR 505; [2007] HCA 27 Dickson v R [2017] NSWCCA 78 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Garrett v The Queen (1977) 139 CLR 437; [1977] HCA 67 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] 1 AC 529 Island Maritime Ltd v Filipowski (2006) 226 CLR 328; [2006] HCA 30 Kanann v R [2006] NSWCCA 109 Lane v R [2018] HCA 28; (2018) 92 ALJR 689 Likiardopoulos v The Queen (2012) 247 CLR 265; [2012] HCA 37 Nash v R [2019] NSWCCA 124 Popovic v R; Hristovski v R; Bubanja v R; Koloamatangi v R [2016] NSWCCA 202 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 R v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 R v King (1985) 17 A Crim R 184 R v Koloamatangi; R v Popovic (No 6) [2017] NSWSC 1631 R v Popovic; R v Koloamatangi (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1022 Reichel v Magrath (1889) 14 App.Cas. 665 RG v R [2020] NSWCCA 17 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251; [1994] HCA 42 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Storey v The Queen (1978) 140 CLR 364; [1079] HCA 39 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; [1993] HCA 77 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings 2012/370471 Tevi Koloamatangi (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate