NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Booth v Fourmeninapub Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 57 Hearing dates: 23 March 2020 Decision date: 02 April 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; White JA at [62]. Decision: 1. Notice of motion filed 12 December 2019 dismissed, with costs. 2. Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL - further evidence - special grounds - whether further evidence relevant to appeal confined to question of law - whether further evidence not obtainable with reasonable diligence - Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(8)
WORKERS COMPENSATION - appeal from Workers Compensation Commission constituted by President - appeal confined to question of law - whether President erred in disregarding evidence of psychiatrist - distinction between identifying meaning of expert report and evaluating evidence - whether predisposition to bipolar disorder itself a disease which could be aggravated, accelerated, exacerbated or deteriorated during employment - definition of injury in (former) s 4(b)(ii) of Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), considered Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 4 Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), ss 74, 352, 353, 354 Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Asioty v Canberra Abattoir Pty Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 533; [1989] HCA 40 Commissioner for Railways v Bain (1965) 112 CLR 246; [1965] HCA 5 Culver v Sekulich 344 P 2d 146 (Wyo, 1959) Federal Broom Co Pty Ltd v Semlitch (1964) 110 CLR 626; [1964] HCA 34 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCA 378 Fourmeninapub Pty Ltd v Booth [2019] NSWWCCPD 25 Pacific National Pty Ltd v Baldacchino [2018] NSWCA 281 Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 505 Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58; 59 ALJR 844 Rodriguez v Telstra Corp Ltd [2002] FCA 30; 66 ALD 579 Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223 Searle v Commonwealth of Australia (2019) 100 NSWLR 55; [2019] NSWCA 127 Texts Cited: M Black, "Genetics in the Courtroom" (2003) 26(3) UNSWLJ 755 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lynette Booth (Appellant) Fourmeninapub Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Cranitch SC, S Blount and T L Wong (Appellant) L D Robison and T C Jackson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate